Flemming Funch writes about Cleve Backster, a scientist who studies plant/animal relations.#
Over 35 years of meticulous research, Cleve Backster has progressively undermined the notion of a universe comprised of discrete units. He has done for biology and psychology what quantum and standing wave concepts have done for physics. He has documented the connectedness of all life forms and the interactivity of their consciousness. In the light of his work, no rational scientist can any longer deny that the living foods upon which we depend anticipate our actions by perceiving our spontaneous intentions. No medical researcher, sports trainer, or psychologist can ignore the evidence that our thoughts influence the activity of our cells, and, thus, the performance of our bodies. His research has given credence to many theories of mind body reciprocity, as in "inner tennis", use of psychic energy or prayer in distant healing, telepathy, dowsing and other thought-matter interactions.
And Flemming describes an experiment:
So, now, for the simple and interesting experiments. You attach the clips to some plant you have standing around the house. Any plant will do, but a big leafy thing would be good. The meter will just show the needle standing rather still. If you cut off a leaf of the plant, the needle will give a sizable reaction. Not very surprising. But the surprising part is that if you take your scissor and approach the plant, intending to cut a leaf off of it, it will also react in a similar fashion, without you having touched it. It seems to react to your intention somehow. Likewise if you have several plants, maybe of the same kind. Put them in different rooms, to rule out that they can, eh, see each other. Attach the meter to one of them and have somebody watch it. Then go to the other plant and either treaten to cut one of its leaves off, or actually do so. Either way, the plant in the first room will react as if it was happening to itself.
Brittney wrote letters to all her pets over the years.#
One to Abby,
Also, that was the best thing ever when you came back to life. You disappeared for two whole days and my sister was wrecked. (Technically you are her cat, but we lived together for like, 7 years, and you watched me bathe a bunch. So you are partially mine, too.) Then our aunt called and said she'd seen you flattened on the highway. She could tell it was you from your distinctive, squirrel-like tail. My sister had to call in to work she was so destroyed. Mom and the stepdad went and scraped you up off the road and had a little serivce and burial for you in the yard. They say it's important to see the body one last time in order to grieve properly. Everyone was a mess for the rest of the evenin until you showed up the next morning, pretty as you please, at the back door. Whining.
Dean Esmay writes about the world of online dating.#
Online dating has one wonderful feature that normal dating doesn't usually have, by the way: you both know, up front, what you're looking for. You bypass that entire embarassing and uncomfortable dance: "Are you marriage-minded, do you want kids, are you just looking for a good time, are you just looking for a friend, will I look desperate if I reveal my true desires?" POP, you're right past all that bullcrap, and can concentrate on feeling out whether you've found the person you're looking for or not.
Wendy writes about ex-boyfriends and being treated well.#
I can't help but compare the old with the new. The new wins on so many counts that I wonder what ever possessed me to stay with B. What made me think that the way he treated me was OK, even great. Lack of experience, perhaps. Never having had a truly good boyfriend maybe (sorry you two - you know who you are and I love you now but there were severe issues back then, heh).
But now I look at what I have and am awestruck by what I have endured, by the contrast, and by the amazing man who shows me every day that I can be treated well, I should be treated well, that he will treat me well.
Richard replies to Alexander Payne who writes about the geek quest for the "geek girl."#
Alexander then dismisses the idea that geek guys should seek out only geek girls. I wonder if he would agree with the Seinfeldian idea that dating someone exactly like you is, while loads of fun at first, is something to be avoided rather than sought out. Seinfeld, after bumping in to the woman who had the same jokes as he did, same complaints as he did, same viewpoint on life as he did, started dating her and then, incongruously, proposed to marry her. She accepted, but then he came to realize that that "I can't be with someone like me: I hate myself! If anything I need to get the exact opposite of me!" While there's something to be said about looking for the exact opposite of yourself—are there any serious, progressively-minded black girls into that are into goth who are interested in a silly, fairly conservative white guys that wear t-shirts and jeans? (thought I'd try)—that bipolarity seems a little extreme. Probably better to argue for a complementary life-partner: someone who has some similar interests but also has their own interests which are not only new to you but that you are interested in learning about. Or someone that's red freaking hot.
Tony Pierce writes about the best kind of date.#
a hot chick is gonna spend the weekend with me. a vacation of sorts. a weekend excursion. im thinking about just having her get a bunch of food and beer and lock ourselves up in my guest house in the back and lock all the doors. and while she sleeps i'll write and while shes awake we will go through the tivo and just watch and watch and hold hands and watch her try on different outfits.
these are the things hemingway did, im pretty sure.
the drinking parts at least.
Lance Arthur links to I LOVE MEN.#
An unlucky patient went into surgery bearing the words "I love women" tattooed on his leg but when he came out it read "I love men".
A Video of the Trojan Games. (Not work safe if you work in an anti-sex atmosphere.)#