A Message Before I Sail Away
Richard interprets a rule that The Yeti wrote today...#
TheYeti: "When a man gets on an airplane to visit a woman, he is going to try to sleep with her."
TheYeti's rule is the secondary reason—which isn't to discount its imortance—why I don't go and visit female friends who are a plane ride away, the primary one being a lack of sufficient funds. It's not so much the fact that I would try to sleep with them but rather the perception of at least two of my male friends who would would wonder what the real reason is. Quietly—and not so quietly—they would wonder if there was something "more" involved. (This whole notion of "more than just friends is problematic", because romance is a type of friendship, not more of a friendship.) They actually wonder that about all of my female friends, where "there's something there". And yet I hang out with them, go figure.
The rule—or rather the stigma, legitimate or not—applies doubly so to women men have never met physically. If a man is so eager to meet a woman he's never met that he'd pay for a plane ticket, it's almost by definition creepy.
Richard responds to me about bad "advice",#
He's saying that I came to him (or, more accurately, the web) with a problem, and rather than accept his "advice", which wasn't actually advice, but fake advice that intentionally sounds irrational to make a point, e.g. this. So rather than get a chuckle from it, I took it seriously and bristled. Well, it happens. People take me too seriously (or, very rarely, not seriously enough) and I took him too seriously.
I got caught up in my own argument, an argument that's not even mine, that all advice, be it good or bad, is to be rejected in principle because it is simply a subconscious attempt by the advice-giver to control the behaviour of the person receiving the advice. Time and time again, I read articles that tell me what to do, often without even explaining why. The appeal is based on the quality of writing and the authority of the writer rather than the reasons for doing something, i.e. how it benefits the person to do something and what the costs might be. An alternative—a better alternative— to advice is information. People are generally smart enough to make decisions for themselves, and provided with enough good information, people generally make the right one. The right decision for them.
I could not agree more on the problem with advice being subtle coercion. Offer knowledge that a receiver can do whatever he or she wants with, under the goal of giving that person an greater chance of making the best decision for themselves.
Kevin links to a wonderful series, The Philosophers.#
I was lucky enough to catch about 20 minutes of the 9th Circuit recall hearing which was being broadcast by CBS. Funnier than any comedy on prime time while being far less realistic than network court room dramas, I laughed more in 20 minutes than during the entire past season of SNL.
If you thought the Candidates in the recall were clowns, the judges of the 9th circus have them beat. It was a battle of one liners bordering on slapstick comedy.
Philip Greenspun keeps them coming...#
Imagine my delight in running into a friend yesterday. She's a 23-year-old graduate student in computer science at Harvard. Conversation rolled around to programming tools. Unprompted she said "What I think would be best is Common Lisp Object System with a modern type system". I was stunned. I thought it was only dinosaurs like me that clung to Lisp.
I had a second ephiphany for the week... Believing that Lisp circa 1982 plus some mid-1980s ML tricks thrown in is better than all of the new programming tools (C#, Java) that have been built since then is sort of like being a Holocaust denier.