Carlyle writes about precognition...#
``My freshman year I took this course where we learned about coincidence and all that stuff, and "good" evidence versus "crap" evidence and all sorts of other shit...the name of it was "How Do You Know?" and it was the first in a four part series of rhetorical question classes that I have just gotten out of last semester. Anyway. Point. We read this long thing about how you really have so many dreams a night, and your subconscious memory remembers so many of those, that it's really not all that surprising that you sometimes recognize that things from your real life are exactly like something that happened in a dream you had before. Just out of sheer numbers, they said, it was inevitable that you would dream something that would actually happen. ''
Tim Bray writes about "Degrees of Viral Separation"...#
``I gather that Sobig.F is pretty aggressive in looking through your files to find email addresses, but let's imagine that it only looked in the Infectee's address book. Then the Sobig.F assertion would be quite a bit simpler: "Person A sends mail to Persons B and C."
So if you were to gather up a few million instances of Sobig.F-generated email (something that any ISP could do trivially, and the NSA may be doing at this moment), you could produce a pretty interesting map of who knows whom. ''
Razib at Gene Expression writes about how humans are evolving right now...#
``Nick Wade surveys the theory that humans are evolving now, contrary to the conventional assertion that culture, not biology, is driving the transformation of our species. Here something that I am surprised that Wade included in the article:
Not everything is roses in evolution's garden. Ronald Fisher, the British biologist, pointed out in 1930 that the genes for mental ability tend to move upward through the social classes but that fertility is higher in the lower social classes. He concluded that selection constantly opposes genes that favor creativity and intelligence.
Fisher's idea has not been proven wrong in theory, although many biologists, besides detesting it for the support it gave to eugenic policies, believe it has proven false in practice. "It hasn't been formally refuted in the sense that we could never test it," Dr. Pagel said. Though people with fewer resources tend to have more children, that may be for lack of education, not intelligence. [...]
Does anyone really buy this? Yes, the Flynn Effect is undeniable, but assuming the premises, that intelligence is heritable to some extent, that socioeconomic status (SES) has some relationship to innate intellectual capacities and low SES status has a positive correlation with fecundity-it doesn't take a rocket scientist to connect the dots. ''
Razib writes about a book, "The Geography of Thought"...#
``Now, on the point of difficulty unraveling causes and factors in any given phenomena, Nisbett has an interesting point to make on this. The Chinese tendency to accept compromise, to see the truth in every point, and accept that some things are just beyond rational modeling, has been very detrimental to any stab toward a true science. The European tendency to be dogmatic about rational points and attack and tear down contradictions until a coherent model emerges is much more fruitful in the context of scientific progress-Europeans have made many mistakes (phlogistan? ether?), but for every hundred errors one discovers a gem of truth. In contrast the Chinese seemed to accept that the natural world as capricious because humans could not conceive of all under heaven and that the focus should be on social harmony, something which intelligent apes have a much better grasp of. Just because it is difficult does not mean that one should give up the quest, that is the Western view, and the view of those of us who accept that evolutionary psychology might be a bullshit factory, but it is the only game in town and gives us a better grasp of the understanding of human nature than just cordoning off certain avenues of research because they are difficult and prone to error.''
Moxie runs an interview...#
`` In the interest of not letting down those who unabashedly call me a cat blogger, I sat down this evening and had a conversation about the state of the tech industry with Bentley. In particular the California technology economy.
Sadly, Bentley did not have the $3,500 to file to run for Governor but he is an executive on the elite and elusive Board of the California Technology Commission and runs an economic thinktank out of his litter-box. ''
Tony Pierce see babes, photographs babes, an IS a babe...#
``and everyone had tattoos.
beautiful ones.
i saw this girl that was covered in them, gorgeous girl. my heart hopes that she's a stripper but i don't go to any strip clubs so what's the use. she had a great skirt on too. i tried to take a picture but how do you do it and not be like a pervert.''
Tony Pierce has a great outlook on blogs, blogging, and politics...#
``i look at my elected officials the same way that i look at the batteries of my remote control - when they stop being effective, they get removed.
the president, the congress, and the supreme court have not been effective.
dont take it personally.''
i'm panting right now from nervousness#
Kim writes about problems when we use different terminologies...#
``My mom is a doctor. I was talking to her the other day, and I casually mentioned that I had done some coding on the weekend. She looked at me in horror, and it took her a few seconds to understand what I meant.
To her, "coding" means having a heart attack.''
Dan Sugalaski writes about optimizing Parse::RecDescent grammars...#
``Well, first, failure is expensive. I know, I know, Duh!, but it bears repeating. Failure shows up both in rules that actually fail, and rules that succeed but after one or more alternate versions fail first. Scrutinize those rules! Make them as cheap as possible, since odds are (Unless you have a really skewed frequency distribution) that there will be far more failures than successes. Order the rules so you've got the best chance of actually hitting the correct rule first, up to a point. (If you have a rule that succeeds, say, 10% of the time but is horribly expensive to run, you may find it faster to put more likely to fail, but far cheaper, rules before it) Factor out common prefixes (like the "if expr then command" part of the ifelse rule, which is valid for both the if/then and if/then/else forms)''
James Robertson on the coming storm...#
``[...] Get ready for a sellers market in the IT realm again, and soon. Ok, your immediate reaction is that I'm nuts. People have been getting laid off in droves, and offshore outsourcing has been all over the news of late. So where am I coming from? Simple - demographics. The demographic trends indicate a coming shortage, starting sometime in the next two years. And based on the numbers, it could easily be a bigger crunch than 1998-2000. What's driving this? The baby boom generation is starting to retire, and that cohort is bigger than the ones following it - by a lot. Just look around any IT shop, and what do you see? An awful lot of people within a few years of retirement''