In other words, I don't understand
Neopoleon - `` There's a place in downtown Portland called "Pioneer Square" - It's just a city square; basically a meeting place for business people, chess players, prostitutes, drug dealers, and politicians (but the cops have been doing a good job of keeping the politicians away - Pioneer Square is a much safer place now than it was ten years ago). Anyway, it's made out of bricks. I say "made out of" as though to imply that it was some massive undertaking on the scale of the Eiffel Tower or Notre Dame or something, but it wasn't. What really happened is that the mayor stopped one day and said, "We have a whole bunch of extra bricks. Why don't we stick them all in the ground somewhere, and then give that ground a nice name which will attract business people, chess players, prostitutes, drug dealers, and politicians." ''#
Via Brad Delong is The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science - ``2. The discoverer says that a powerful establishment is trying to suppress his or her work. The idea is that the establishment will presumably stop at nothing to suppress discoveries that might shift the balance of wealth and power in society. Often, the discoverer describes mainstream science as part of a larger conspiracy that includes industry and government. Claims that the oil companies are frustrating the invention of an automobile that runs on water, for instance, are a sure sign that the idea of such a car is baloney. In the case of cold fusion, Pons and Fleischmann blamed their cold reception on physicists who were protecting their own research in hot fusion.''#
Michael Feldman links the God Detector - ``How many times have we heard it said, "Oh, Lord, give me a sign!" Alas, too often the reply is vague and ambiguous: the phone rings at an opportune time, a feather falls from out of the blue, a water stain appears that resembles a religious image. We all want to know if God exists; maybe He just needs a reliable method to let us know He's here.''#
Via Yeti Suit - Something to make Women feel better#
Yeti also has written advice - ``A philosopher with a heavy dose of religious upbringing might say that all things come from the wellspring known as God. What you know can not always be put into words. Those who attempt to do so find themselves limited to the extent of what they've been taught. Those who learn to listen to themselves soon become cognizant of a vast melody originating in the hearts of their fellow human beings. The joy in your note, in your voice, is recognizing that what you are looking for, everyone is looking for.''#
Piers Cawley writes about Trust and Agile methods. - ``That's why it's so refreshing to read about Agile methods. Trust is hardwired into them at such a deep level that almost nobody bothers to mention it. It's why they seem like such radical ideas, they are so far removed from the standard view of how organizations work. Much of the (remarkably vehement) criticism (and subsequent failure to communicate) that I've seen seems to stem from the fact that the critics are worried about the downside when trust breaks down and the advocates are just getting on with trusting each other because it works. '' - Most design methodologies and standards assume that programmers are untrustworthy and need direction, rules, and sticks to punish them. Agile methods differ. - Piers also write this, ``I've come to believe that people repay trust with trustworthiness. I was delighted to read in the New Scientist about an experiment which seemed to back up my intuition. In an experiment, randomly selected people were asked to give up to $10 dollars to a person who was unknown to them. That other person would receive 3 times as much money as the first person gave, and could then return any amount of money to the first person. (The subjects didn't know who the other party was, the 'game' was handled by software). Economic theory, in the shape of the Nash Equilibrium says that the rational thing to do is for the first person to give $0. The second person's rational strategy would be to keep all money they were given and to return none of it. This is not what happened. It turns out that 50% of the first subjects sent some money, and of those who received money, 75% returned some.'' - Cool.#
Via Nova is an article about Pulstar stars possibly being "interstellar becons" - ``One of the most interesting articles of the year proposes a new theory that pulsars are extraterrestrial beacons of some sort. According to the author, a number of odd characteristics of pulsars are best explained by intelligence, not physics. This article is an absolute must read. [...] Now the question is, suppose that the author is correct and pulsars are beacons that transmit intelligent signals. What are they saying? One proposal is that they are intergalactic warning beacons -- cosmic lighthouses to warn of recurring galactic superwave explosions. However, I doubt this -- why would these beacons exhibit short-term variability if all they were there for was to issue alerts for explosions that only occur on multi-million-year timescales? It seems to me that the resolution of information-change is quite high leading me to suspect that these "beacons" -- if that is what they are -- are being used to transmit data on an ongoing basis. One possibility is that they are used to measure gravitational distortions over long distances -- perhaps some advanced civilization uses this technology to graph fluctuations in the shape of space for some purpose. Or perhaps these beacons mark wormhole jump-point locations, and quality readings. Another possibility: Are they some sort of cosmic GPS network that enables a sort of universal coordinate grid for navigation? Or are these deep space data relays -- perhaps beaming news reports between galaxies? An interstellar Internet? Another possibility: Are they intergalactic Blogs? If so, why aren't they listed in Syndic8 yet?''#
Via Nova - ``Paul Ford has been thinking about the Chinese Room thought-experiment, John Searle's famous refutation of the strong-AI hypothesis. As Paul points out: programs have syntax, minds have semantics, syntax is not the same as semantics, therefore computers are not minds.''#
Jen Chung - ``Renee Zellweger has agreed to play Bridget Jones once again for the sequel, and she will indeed pack on the pounds: The Age reports that on top of her $15 million salary, Renee will get another $225,000 per kilo she adds to her weight. Gothamist has mixed opinions about this. We feel that her performance in Bridget Jones was brilliant, but since she's gone totally anorexic post-Bridget Jones, we're concerned that she'll starve herself so much after making the sequel that her kidneys will fall and she'll be walking around with an IV drip''#
Bayesian Categorization is like DEVONthink#
``Finding arguments against Java is like trying to make a
teenager depressed.How about:
Any of these can be `killer' problems. It certainly makes Java useless
1. No syntactic abstraction (macros)
2. No multiple inheritence
3. Single dispatch
4. C-like syntax
5. Verbosity
6. Expressions and statements that are not interchangable
7. In general, no tail recursion.
8. Dichotomy between primitive types and class types
9. No MOP
for some of the projects I work on.But there is a wonderful refutation to all of these:
`Hey, at least it isn't Perl.' ''